What's new
VORON Design

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members!

BTT Octopus Pro vs Mellow 64bit FLY Gemini V3

I would take the board with 2240 drivers over 2209.

  • limited budget - No way, my Vorons have cost way more then the X1C by far.
  • the need to print models bigger than 256mm - Yes
  • customization without limits and full control of each aspect of the machine - Yes
  • Cheaper spare parts due to the fact they are not proprietary - Nope, parts for Bambu labs are far cheaper then any printer on the market. But they don't really break. Hotends are on $35 US currency.
 
Certainly it is possible to do it on a smaller budget when you buy all the clones from aliexpress, Amazon or Ebay, but you will soon regret it. I strongly advise you to not go the budget route, and I say this with my own 3d printing startup experience with Creality and spares from those sources. You will more likely pull out all your hair then enjoy the savings you made.
 
Certainly it is possible to do it on a smaller budget when you buy all the clones from aliexpress, Amazon or Ebay, but you will soon regret it. I strongly advise you to not go the budget route, and I say this with my own 3d printing startup experience with Creality and spares from those sources. You will more likely pull out all your hair then enjoy the savings you made.
I agree, the budget parts can work but can also cause many headaches.
Also maybe you can build it for cheaper if you kept it stock but I don't know any Voron builders who keep them stock.

If I had to guess I would say I have spend over $3500 on my 2.4.
But I don't care, its fun.
 
I agree, the budget parts can work but can also cause many headaches.
Also maybe you can build it for cheaper if you kept it stock but I don't know any Voron builders who keep them stock.

If I had to guess I would say I have spend over $3500 on my 2.4.
But I don't care, its fun.
I did not pay for the machine itself, it was given to me by my dad who lost interest. I think he paid euro 1400 second hand.
Since then I added the following:
Chaoticlab cnc aluminium parts full kit
orbiter V2
revo micro ( I will lose this one, already bought its replacement)
phaetus rapido UHF
orbiter fillament sensor
cartographer
canbus EBB36
U2C
canbus cable IGUS
octopus V1.1 (spider broke)
BTT piscreen tft50
complete set new gates belts
cpap fan with hoses
webcam

I am not interested in the costs, just hope the wife will never see my bank statements :eek:
 
FYI, in all that wall of text I noticed a mention of Stealthburner vs Galileo. Be aware the Stealthburner is the entire tool head. In that is the stock Clockwork 2 extruder. Galileo 2 as an extruder, it can swap into the Stealthburner in place of the Clockwork 2. You just have to print up the SB parts for it instead of the stand alone parts. My current Stealthburner setup has a G2 in it replacing my trusty old CW2 extruder.
 
this year the beacon became dual setup also which means you can choose usb or canbus.
Good news, but I'm afraid my choice is very limited. Here is the only place where I could find one. There are multiple versions and, again, StealthBurner is the only one supported. There is also a "Not soldered" version, any chance to make it work with Galileo?
They call it IDM rather than Cartographer. If I have understood well, this probe is open hardware, so they may have developed their own version. Need to understand if there are limitations, for example I read is not compatible with plates with magnets: isn't the magnets mod what we want for better accuracy and speed?
1750371809593.webp
With regards to the compatibility of the boards to toolheads I cannot help you. I have never been a fan of the standard toolheads on anything, not only Voron, and as of many years I prefer to design my own combos for different purposes. My clockwork extruder was a nightmare and I do not even know exactly what was the version as I could not find conclusive details.
I continuosly see the SB as the main (and most of the times the only one) supported toolend in each component I want to implement. The main question is: when Galileo is not supported, can I hope I can still use the component with some user mod, some adapter available in the market or designed by me? As long as is a matter to attach the two pieces together I should be to find a workaround in some way, but if hardware incompatibility is involved, than is a whole different story.

Do you mean to say you designed the toolend yourself? 100% printed ABS? To me sounds like a solution to take into consideration. Seems much easier and cleaner rather than try to adapt components with hacks and adapters.
The way you mentioned the octopus sockets and the bom list amount of motors is slightly off I think. 4 motors are z axis, 2 motors are the corexy motors and one is the extruder. so this is 7 motors of which one will move to the canbus board and frees up one on the octopus. This means you could theoretically add the awd without an expansion board. This is why I said I do not know what other extras will require an expansion board, because I do not use any.
Really great news! Although I'm left with no free slot I can always use an expansion board in case of future upgrades. Now the hardest part: BTT or Mellow CAN boards. They both have onboard driver, so the choice is not easy at all.
The electronics do not weigh enough to be of significant effect but my first few months of ownership of this machine was filled with weekly flips because the wiring was all wrong and broke. That is why I went full out on this drastic solution.
Yes, there are so many wires and they need to be kept well organized and firm. Aparts the classic cable ties, there are in the market different kind of ingenuous products that makes the job much easier and clean.
Yes the footprint right now is too large and I am designing it to be an upright box the width of the power supply. It has not got any connectors yet (unfortunately), but it might in the future. That would make life even easier still.
An upright box would be much better and compact. Keep us updated!
 
I would take the board with 2240 drivers over 2209.
I can only find Octopus Pro sold in combo with 2209/8 and 5160, but what you say about 2240 is very interesting:
FeatureTMC2240TMC2209
Voltage supportUp to 60VUp to 29V
Maximum current~2.5A RMS~2.0A RMS
CommunicationSPI onlyUART only
Sensorless homingNo (not supported)Yes
CoolStep supportYesLimited
StealthChop/SpreadCycleYes/YesYes/Yes
Thermal performanceMuch cooler, more efficientHotter at same current
ReliabilityHigh, good for 48V/high-current buildsReliable but limited for 48V
Use caseIndustrial-grade, high-voltage VoronBudget, 24V Voron printers

🔥 Key Differences​

✅ 1.​

  • TMC2240 supports up to 60V, ideal for 48V Voron builds like yours.
  • TMC2209 is limited to 29V, so not safe for 48V use.

✅ 2.​

  • TMC2240 uses SPI, offering more stable, noise-resistant communication (better for high-speed).
  • TMC2209 uses UART, which is easier to set up but less robust for complex builds.

✅ 3.​

  • TMC2240 runs cooler at higher currents, making it better for high-performance motors (like LDO 48V).
  • TMC2209 can overheat more easily in high-speed builds, especially at >1.4A RMS.

✅ 4.​

  • Only TMC2209 supports sensorless homing (common on V0.1/V2.4).
  • TMC2240 does not, so you need physical endstops.

Is up to 60V voltage support a reality or another ChatGPT mistake? The ones I could find are limited to 36V.

  • limited budget - No way, my Vorons have cost way more then the X1C by far.
Oh yes, if someone want to enhance a Voron there are endless ways. If you ended up with a Voron much more expensive than the X1C, then you must have a beast for which a bambulab can't even compare. Did you posted your machine details somewhere? I'm very curious.
  • Cheaper spare parts due to the fact they are not proprietary - Nope, parts for Bambu labs are far cheaper then any printer on the market. But they don't really break. Hotends are on $35 US currency.
Well, the Voron spare parts I had chance to see were cheaper. Don't know what to say, I can only hope to never have to deal with the expensive ones! Our friend here got its Rapido broke. Some parts of it are cheap and hope he will not be forced to replace the whole unit because this is very expensive. Fortunately this seems to be an isolate case.
 
Certainly it is possible to do it on a smaller budget when you buy all the clones from aliexpress, Amazon or Ebay, but you will soon regret it. I strongly advise you to not go the budget route, and I say this with my own 3d printing startup experience with Creality and spares from those sources. You will more likely pull out all your hair then enjoy the savings you made.
I agree, the budget parts can work but can also cause many headaches.
Also maybe you can build it for cheaper if you kept it stock but I don't know any Voron builders who keep them stock.

If I had to guess I would say I have spend over $3500 on my 2.4.
But I don't care, its fun.
You're right and I'm trying to find the right balance. Cheap parts to avoid at all costs are some of the motion system, so I will stick with POWGE.
Something else? Not sure about linear rails, I've read there are good clones and I'm trying to understand how to identify the good ones.

Yes, a stock Voron does not make sense. And I am correct to say that a stock one, in 2025, compared to commercial printers, is not even good like it was years ago? Before I decided to go with a Voron build I've read many reviews and comparisons. Many people said that a stock Voron was more or less on pair with Bambulabs, but now that I'm getting more into it, seem to be one have to go very far from stock to reach the same level.
For sure, with over $3500, you have gone very far than anyone else. I really want to see your printer and know all the specs!
 
Last edited:
I did not pay for the machine itself, it was given to me by my dad who lost interest. I think he paid euro 1400 second hand.
Since then I added the following:
Chaoticlab cnc aluminium parts full kit
orbiter V2
revo micro ( I will lose this one, already bought its replacement)
phaetus rapido UHF
orbiter fillament sensor
cartographer
canbus EBB36
U2C
canbus cable IGUS
octopus V1.1 (spider broke)
BTT piscreen tft50
complete set new gates belts
cpap fan with hoses
webcam

I am not interested in the costs, just hope the wife will never see my bank statements :eek:
Wow! Really lot of stuff! Apart the aestethic mods and the components you know are already on my list, what you feel to recommend? I mean something that worth and you really noticed great improvements.

In my case the bank statements are checked carefully, so I have to use a different plan: buy all at once because after that it will become much harder any additional upgrade :cry:
 
FYI, in all that wall of text I noticed a mention of Stealthburner vs Galileo. Be aware the Stealthburner is the entire tool head. In that is the stock Clockwork 2 extruder. Galileo 2 as an extruder, it can swap into the Stealthburner in place of the Clockwork 2. You just have to print up the SB parts for it instead of the stand alone parts. My current Stealthburner setup has a G2 in it replacing my trusty old CW2 extruder.
This message deserves 5 stars! As someone who never owned a 3D printer, is very easy to get confused. What you say is a really great news. It means that as long as a component is designed fot the StealthBurner I'm ready to go, even if inside there is a Galileo. Do you have Galileo version 2? I've read this version has been designed to fit as is and without any adapter, but I'm not sure.

Thanks again, I was in doubt between BTT and Mellow CAN boards and I believed there were compatibility issues with Galileo. Now that the choice is not limited annymore to the kind of extruder, do you feel to recommend one over another?

In my BOM list there is "BMG Extruder Components Kit" (I selected direct drive in the configurator). Do I still need it in a StealthBurner + Galileo 2 combo?

Thanks again!

EDIT: I missed out the "G2" meaning. So, yes, you have a Galileo 2 and the printed parts for it are still needed. No idea on how I can print them with an unfinished build, but I'll find some way. May be I can fit the extruder with some dirty hack and just for the time needed to print the parts.
 
Last edited:
Yes there always comes a point at which you need to decide and it is hard for somebody else to make up your mind. What you are doing is good but you can take it too far. At some point you are comparing apples with pears and trying to decide which is best. At that point it depends on weather you want an apple or you would like a pear more, its up to you that moment.

As a starter note, that sensor is not a beacon as such, it is a most likely a clone and you cannot take beacon specifications and apply them. It is a shame you cannot find the real beacon, for instance from Jake 3d somewhere, because the beacon is absolutely stunning. My brother just installed one and the accuracy and speeds are mind blowing. Second for accuracy I believe would be the cartographer. Not up there with the beacon for accuracy but speed is the same so all in all way good enough for 3d printing. I cannot say anything about your found product, it could be a beacon with a rebrand on it but I doubt it.

I never used the Galileo so I cannot say with what tooheads it is compatible. Yes I desin my own 100% and I always try to use a metal toolplate. Before now I also made my own metal tooplates but now there are many on the market. One of the reasons I went with the cartographer because they have their own metal toolplate made for it. unfortunately it did not fit my voron, because I think mine is a bit older and it had two linear rails for x axis, but I converted mine to one big x rail and modified the toolplate. This is not an option that is good for everybody because I have the use of advanced equipment at work. Without that I would not do these things.

Choice of canboard I again cannot help I am afraid. All I can say is that next time I do a canbus machine I will probably use the octopus again and utilise the onboard. Simply for ease of use and compact controler. The U2C board does add wiring and with that comes questions and thinking about how to position them and route those wires efficiently. Next time I will probably like to be without those things.

Today is my last day at work before a week of holidays so that update will have to wait. No tinkering, no printing and as little as internet as possible for a whole week. :cool:

I wish you all the best with your choice making. I think you know enough of it, and what is stopping you know is simply your own demons. I would consider the following:

1) What am I going to use it for? Based on this chose a hotend that is good enough with regards to flow and will give you the right nozzle selection. For years the REVO Micro was good enough for me, now I stepped up to the Phaetus rapido UHF.
2) How big does it need to be? Consider also that some mods will take away space! Also look at your available space, a giant 520 mm cubic is larger in real life then most people realise. This is the size of the V2.4-350. It is huge plus if you mount a camera and you put your roll of filament somewhere you need space.
3) Available spare parts. You already said you have trouble sourcing some so obviously this is important.
4) Not in the least your skills. Building one of these is a big commitment and will be frustrating at times. Make sure you know where to find help and advise and that you have the right tools available. The tools they supply with parts are meant for one use only. In my case they go in the bin instantly. Also to build one means you will temporarilly need even more space! you will be rotating and flipping this thing regularly until it is done.

I enjoyed this thread so far so I will revisit back and see how things progressed af course. And when there is updates on the controller I will mention that too.
 
This message deserves 5 stars! As someone who never owned a 3D printer, is very easy to get confused. What you say is a really great news. It means that as long as a component is designed fot the StealthBurner I'm ready to go, even if inside there is a Galileo. Do you have Galileo version 2? I've read this version has been designed to fit as is and without any adapter, but I'm not sure.

Thanks again, I was in doubt between BTT and Mellow CAN boards and I believed there were compatibility issues with Galileo. Now that the choice is not limited annymore to the kind of extruder, do you feel to recommend one over another?

In my BOM list there is "BMG Extruder Components Kit" (I selected direct drive in the configurator). Do I still need it in a StealthBurner + Galileo 2 combo?

Thanks again!

EDIT: I missed out the "G2" meaning. So, yes, you have a Galileo 2 and the printed parts for it are still needed. No idea on how I can print them with an unfinished build, but I'll find some way. May be I can fit the extruder with some dirty hack and just for the time needed to print the parts.
Yes, it is a Galileo 2. It is a straight plug-in swap to replace the stock Clockwork 2. You just need to print 4 parts for it, everything else is included in the kit.

I can't comment on CAN--I'm still on now "old school" toolhead and breakout boards with cable chains. It works, so I have no driving reason to swap.

I have run Revos on my printers since I built them--pretty much when Revos first came out. The Trident and V0.2 got them from the start, and when the Voron version came out one went into the Trident and the Micro moved to my Prusa Mini. They aren't the fastest out there, but at this point they are workhorses.

When I built the Trident, there weren't any reputable kits out yet so I self-sourced. I also spread the cost of parts across a few months so I could get better parts. None of the electronics have been replaced due to failure. The one exception was Revo heaters--but those were a couple of first-run units with early production teething issues. Aside from that, some wiring and nozzles due to simply wearing out and some other pieces due to upgrades.
 
Yes there always comes a point at which you need to decide and it is hard for somebody else to make up your mind. What you are doing is good but you can take it too far. At some point you are comparing apples with pears and trying to decide which is best. At that point it depends on weather you want an apple or you would like a pear more, its up to you that moment.
I understand what you means. Once you end up with apples and pears, sometimes you'll like to eat apples, other times pears. Unfortunately I can't afford such luxury, so a Voron is a mandatory choice. Hovewer, I must admit that, on pair of price, I would have had very hard times to decide between the twos.
As a starter note, that sensor is not a beacon as such, it is a most likely a clone and you cannot take beacon specifications and apply them. It is a shame you cannot find the real beacon, for instance from Jake 3d somewhere, because the beacon is absolutely stunning. My brother just installed one and the accuracy and speeds are mind blowing. Second for accuracy I believe would be the cartographer. Not up there with the beacon for accuracy but speed is the same so all in all way good enough for 3d printing. I cannot say anything about your found product, it could be a beacon with a rebrand on it but I doubt it.
Ok, it looks like this is something for which I must be very careful. The first thing I learned is that I should prefer Beacon and is not easy to distinguish it with Cartographer because they look the same included the one I found on AE. And when clones are involved, specs must be carefully checked because there's no guarantee they match the offficial ones.

So let start with the easist way. I found Beacon in stock from the official store. Not sure, but for our StealthBurner + Galileo, I suppose we need variant D (not the H), standard profile, 6ft cable (included). It's $80 and between shipping and import taxes is going to be at least 3 times more expensive than the one I found on AE and in any case too much money for a tiny board like that (more expensive even than Octopus Pro + drivers). I can't find any Beacon probe from the Jake3D store, but I suppose it would be even more expensive.
I'm afraid my only option are clones and from what I see, even official Beacon has similar issues:
WARNING: Requires a conductive surface or substrate on printer bed to work. Bed stacks that include oversized fixed magnets are not recommended and may not work with Beacon.
May I ask what kind of bed and magnets size your brother uses with its Beacon? May be the same configuration also works with clones.
I never used the Galileo so I cannot say with what tooheads it is compatible. Yes I desin my own 100% and I always try to use a metal toolplate. Before now I also made my own metal tooplates but now there are many on the market. One of the reasons I went with the cartographer because they have their own metal toolplate made for it. unfortunately it did not fit my voron, because I think mine is a bit older and it had two linear rails for x axis, but I converted mine to one big x rail and modified the toolplate. This is not an option that is good for everybody because I have the use of advanced equipment at work. Without that I would not do these things.
Our friend explained well why I should not be worried about compatibility. So, one problem (and a big one) less. Isn't 100% metal going to be too much weight? What's wrong with ABS? From what I've read, this is an area where we should try to reduce weight as much as possible. In any case, without a CNC machine, my only option is the regular way.
I think you might be right. Your could have been R1. Can't find the link, but I remember it was R2 the version with the major changes to the linear rails you mentioned.
Choice of canboard I again cannot help I am afraid. All I can say is that next time I do a canbus machine I will probably use the octopus again and utilise the onboard. Simply for ease of use and compact controler.
You means Octopus Pro + EBB, right? From what I saw, even the lowest Mellow Fly is onboard driver. The Pro suppports 2240, a version that I've never taken care of until NoGuru joined the thread and talked about it.
Can you confirm your EBB required a mod in order to fit your SB? This does not seem required with Mellow.
The U2C board does add wiring and with that comes questions and thinking about how to position them and route those wires efficiently. Next time I will probably like to be without those things.
Yes, and an extra communication layer (USB) is very bad. Something that I also want to avoid, but I'm wondering if this is a limitation of the Octopus rather than the CANBus boards:
1750449503710.webp
Seems that the USB adapter is needed in any case, but stupid question: can't we just move it in the electronic bay and fix at least the wires issue?
This thread was about Octopus vs Fly Gemini and some people quickly recommended to stick with Octopus and they're probably right at least for simpler scenarios. Right now I see the Fly Gemini supports CANBus natively (cb port directly on board). Are we sure Octopus is still a better choice? No raspberry needed in fly gemini, integrated wifi, native canbus etc. There are only four slots for drivers, but they have a 4 slots expansion board.
Don't know what to say.
I wish you all the best with your choice making. I think you know enough of it, and what is stopping you know is simply your own demons.
Yes and they are so many :cry:
1) What am I going to use it for? Based on this chose a hotend that is good enough with regards to flow and will give you the right nozzle selection. For years the REVO Micro was good enough for me, now I stepped up to the Phaetus rapido UHF.
I should probably check better, but a complete Revo kit is about $40 cheaper than a Rapido. A good saving, but I feel like the hotend is the last part where one should go cheap. What I learned is that Rapido requires hot-tightening (240+°C) for nozzle swaps. Need to investigate on how much this can complicate usage. In any case I'll have to live with it.
2) How big does it need to be? Consider also that some mods will take away space! Also look at your available space, a giant 520 mm cubic is larger in real life then most people realise. This is the size of the V2.4-350. It is huge plus if you mount a camera and you put your roll of filament somewhere you need space.
Well, as long as mods do not reduce the print size I think I should be perfectly fine with it. I don't need a portable printer.
Camera is an upgrade I plan for the future. Modern cameras are very tiny, so I hope to not have to worry about space.
3) Available spare parts. You already said you have trouble sourcing some so obviously this is important.
4) Not in the least your skills. Building one of these is a big commitment and will be frustrating at times. Make sure you know where to find help and advise and that you have the right tools available. The tools they supply with parts are meant for one use only. In my case they go in the bin instantly. Also to build one means you will temporarilly need even more space! you will be rotating and flipping this thing regularly until it is done.
I would say is more like I can't source a particular part at any time. I have to wait the right time, nothing unmanageable with a bit of patience.
Believe me, when you have already spent months to design your build you get so frustrated to a point that you see as pure fun any issue that may occur during the build. Although I've checked around 80% of the BOM list, I had no chance to see such "one use only" tools you're talking about. Only hope to hit the target with a single shot.
I already know the build will have to enter into "stand-by mode" for a reason or another several times. I'm prepared for this. Thanks for all your tips, very precious!
I enjoyed this thread so far so I will revisit back and see how things progressed af course. And when there is updates on the controller I will mention that too.
Same for me! If I ever manage to determine the right parts to buy (I still have big doubts if I should go 100% BTT, Mellow or a mix of the twos and the probe is likely to be postponed on build completion if I can't find a suitable one now) I'll open a new thread to list the parts I'm going to buy. Many stock parts will ptobably need to be changed in order to be used in my custom build and I feel this is where I'll probably end up with mistakes.

Thanks again
 
Yes, it is a Galileo 2. It is a straight plug-in swap to replace the stock Clockwork 2. You just need to print 4 parts for it, everything else is included in the kit.

I can't comment on CAN--I'm still on now "old school" toolhead and breakout boards with cable chains. It works, so I have no driving reason to swap.

I have run Revos on my printers since I built them--pretty much when Revos first came out. The Trident and V0.2 got them from the start, and when the Voron version came out one went into the Trident and the Micro moved to my Prusa Mini. They aren't the fastest out there, but at this point they are workhorses.

When I built the Trident, there weren't any reputable kits out yet so I self-sourced. I also spread the cost of parts across a few months so I could get better parts. None of the electronics have been replaced due to failure. The one exception was Revo heaters--but those were a couple of first-run units with early production teething issues. Aside from that, some wiring and nozzles due to simply wearing out and some other pieces due to upgrades.
Excellent! This greatly simplify things!

I just mentioned Revos in my previous message. It's around $40 less than a Rapido. Not bad, but I feel like the hotend is the last part I want to go cheap if I have performance in mind.

I'm also using a similar trick. A full commercial kit is very expensive, but if you source the parts yourself and have enough patient to wait for the right deals, then is going to be much cheaper.

Is very comforting to hear that you never had electronics failures. This means that is perfectly doable to reach the same reliability level of Bambulab printers.
 
A couple of things from that last batch of posts.

Whether you have the stock Clockwork 2 or the Galileo 2 extruder, that makes zero difference to what version of Cartographer you need. The extruder sits on top of the tool head (and again, the Galileo 2 is a straight plug-in swap). The Cartographer bolts to the bottom of the Stealthburner in the same basic place as the stock inductive probe. That said I have no experience with the nuances of it since I'm sticking to Tap; Cartographer may be the new hotness that everyone is raving about, but it's back to an inductive sensor rather than a contact sensor. That's why I swapped fisrt to Klicky, then to Tap.

Next is to point out Revo is cold swap & no tools. Nozzle swaps are super easy on Revos. Also with the integrated heat break, there's virtually no ooze issue (if you're getting ooze you have bigger problems). There was a while I had a bunch pf print jobs lined up where I was literally swapping the nozzle between each job; just let things cool enough I could pull the installed one without burning my fingers.
 
@claudermilk Thanks for sharing your experience! Your details on the sensor helped to simplify researches.
Whether you have the stock Clockwork 2 or the Galileo 2 extruder, that makes zero difference to what version of Cartographer you need. The extruder sits on top of the tool head (and again, the Galileo 2 is a straight plug-in swap). The Cartographer bolts to the bottom of the Stealthburner in the same basic place as the stock inductive probe.
From what I've understood, as long as we have a StealthBurner, each component should fit without issues. At worse we may need to print/buy adapters and I'm perfectly fine with it.
Cartographer may be the new hotness that everyone is raving about, but it's back to an inductive sensor rather than a contact sensor. That's why I swapped fisrt to Klicky, then to Tap.
And I wonder why given that inductive sensor is less accurate:
It is a shame you cannot find the real beacon, for instance from Jake 3d somewhere, because the beacon is absolutely stunning. My brother just installed one and the accuracy and speeds are mind blowing. Second for accuracy I believe would be the cartographer. Not up there with the beacon for accuracy but speed is the same so all in all way good enough for 3d printing.
Speed seems to be the same, so accuracy is the only key difference, but I wonder if really makes so big difference in real world. For sure it is terms of price. I'll try to see if there is some good clone. He didn't mentioned if it was the old or the new Cartographer. I suppose the old Cartographer would be a very bad choice, right? Otherwise the new version would have no reason to exist.

You mentioned klicky and this has been the key to (at least partially) solve the mistery of the clone I found on AE. The title states that is intended as a Klicky Tap replacement and this may explain the issues with magnets:
1750530894717.png
I've not understood well what of mechanism it uses for detection, but it doesn't matter: If you switched back to Tap, then it must a very bad sensor.
Next is to point out Revo is cold swap & no tools. Nozzle swaps are super easy on Revos. Also with the integrated heat break, there's virtually no ooze issue (if you're getting ooze you have bigger problems). There was a while I had a bunch pf print jobs lined up where I was literally swapping the nozzle between each job; just let things cool enough I could pull the installed one without burning my fingers.
Thanks for letting me know such downsides. When I was looking for the right hotend, all people said Rapido was the way go showing videos to demonstrate how much was great. No one talked about nozzle swap and ooze. I have no idea if this is maneagable or not and I'm afraid I will only see on the field.

Thanks again
 
Top