What are the advantages?
Nailed it! I pretty much just want to tinker and see the results of running it.More torque (allows faster accelerations), shorter belt distances from motor-to-toolhead (supposedly makes input shaping more effective), and for the V2.4, a more balanced gantry weight.
Oh, and street cred. Since just building a Voron isn't good enough anymore.
@aTinyShellScript Did you run the VZbot motors with the round shaft or can I use a flat shaft motor. I ask because I won some LDO-42STH48-2804AH (S55) from the Armchair Discord a while back and wanted to use those if I am successful at cutting the shafts down to about 22mm from 55mm.
I think it would be better. I run the DB on my v0 and it is a great toolhead. I will consider making that change, thanks for the suggestion.Is the situation any better if you switched to the Dragon Burner toolhead? I've read nothing but praise about it lately.
That looks neat what immediate advantage do you see after the awd implementation?
I still have some kinks to work out but the prints look better over all. I have 6mm acrylic panels and they doors are hitting the motors so I have to redesign or change the doors. And my Toolhead USB cable stopped sending 24v to the tool head. I made a new wire loom and it works but still need to mount it.That looks neat what immediate advantage do you see after the awd implementation?
Hi @aTinyShellScript does it have to be a long shafted one? or just regular nema17 will do?You can use any motor but you'll likely want the grub screws on the front motors to be on the round sections of the shaft vs the flats.
You can use a regular shafted motor. I as 55 shafted motors laying around so I used those in combination with the Monolith gantry bearing holder for the shaft. I should try and upload a video when I get a chance.Hi @aTinyShellScript does it have to be a long shafted one? or just regular nema17 will do?